GAMBLING HARM
|
>
|
In 2014, Family First asked politicians, will you SUPPORT or OPPOSE a nationwide ‘sinking lid’ (a progressive reduction) policy on gaming machines? Only three centre right parties clearly supported a ‘sinking lid’ and they were NZ First, Conservative Party and United Future.(more) |
|
>
|
Electronic gambling machines (pokies) venues tend to be overly represented in lower income communities and town centres. Māori and Pasifika populations are effectively being disproportionately targeted and often severely harmed by them.(more) |
|
>
|
The harm generated by pokies in terms of poverty, relationship break-up, depression, domestic violence, crime, neglected children, and the greatest losses by gamblers from pokie machines tend also to be drawn disproportionately from Māori, Pasifika, and lower income communities and families.(more) |
|
>
|
Family First wanted The GAMBLING (GAMBLING HARM REDUCTION) AMENDMENT BILL to enable local authorities in consultation with their communities to reduce the number of pokie machines in their districts, determine where pokie machines may be sited and how the proceeds can be distributed.(more) |
|
>
|
Give gamblers more ability to limit and control their own gambling behaviour through player tracking devices and pre-commit cards.(more) |
|
>
|
Require the distribution of proceeds to be carried out primarily for the benefit of community organisations operating within the geographic community in which the venue is located.(more) |
|
>
|
While we acknowledge that the community benefits from the grants made by Gambling Trusts, the social costs and net losses of participants well exceeds the community gains. Vulnerable families should not be sacrificed simply because charitable organisations need funding.(more) |
|
>
|
Significant risk factors include being between 25-34, Maori or Pacific ethnicity, lower educational attainment, being employed and living alone. Health Ministry figures show 36% of clients of problem gambling services last year were Maori, more than twice their 15% share of the population.(more) |
COMMENTARY-The GAMBLING (GAMBLING HARM REDUCTION) AMENDMENT BILL
Source: Family First
This issue was raised in 2012 with is a private member’s bill in the name of Maori MP Te Ururoa Flavell.
Please note: this bill applies to pokies in suburbs and towns – not casinos. That’s a separate issue
Purpose
The aim of this Bill is to enable “local authorities, in consultation with their communities, to reduce the number of, or even eliminate, pokies from those suburbs and towns where they are particularly concentrated or doing particular harm”. The Bill also changes the responsibility for distributing pokie funds and “proposes to give gamblers more ability to limit and control their own gambling behaviour through player tracking and pre-commit cards”.Background
“Electronic gambling machines (pokies) venues tend to be overly represented in lower income communities and town centres. Māori and Pasifika populations are effectively beingdisproportionately targeted and often severely harmed by them. The harm generated by pokies in terms of poverty, relationship break-up, depression, domestic violence, crime, neglected children, and the greatest losses by gamblers from pokie machines tend also to be drawn disproportionately from Māori, Pasifika, and lower income communities and families”FAMILY FIRST SUPPORTS THE INTENT OF THE BILL
-
Enabling local authorities in consultation with their communities to:
* reduce the number of pokie machines in their districts
* determine where pokie machines may be sited
* how the proceeds can be distributed -
Giving gamblers more ability to limit and control their own gambling behaviour through player tracking devices and pre-commit cards
-
Requiring the distribution of proceeds to be carried out primarily for the benefit of community organisations operating within the geographic community in which the venue is located
More on this gambling harm bill
View these Centre Right NZ Political Party Policies and voting position on REDUCED GAMBLING.
Note: Policies subject to change. Please check the Policy Links for the latest Policy if available. These are the voting positions of party leaders for the 2014 General Election as reported to Family First who asked the questions below. Please refer to the linked website ‘Value Your Vote 2014‘ for more information and updates.
| PARTY | VOTING POSITION/ POLICY | Policy link |
|
Questions asked for the 2014 election
|
Reduced gamblingWill you SUPPORT or OPPOSE a nationwide ‘sinking lid’ (a progressive reduction) policy on gaming machines?
GREEN answers support the Conservative position. |
|
 |
Jamie Whyte OPPOSED |
Policy link |
 |
Peter Dunne SUPPORTS |
Policy link |
 |
Winston Peters SUPPORTS |
Policy link |
 |
John Key NO RESPONSE |
Policy link |
 |
Colin Craig SUPPORTS |
Policy link |
FAMILY FIRST |
 |
||
| ORGANISATION TOPICS: Sex Ed in Schools, Mindfulness in Schools, Wicked Campers, Paid Parental Leave, Easter Trading, Into the River, Pedophile Register, Income Slitting, Street Prostitution, Child Care Debate, Billboards, City Pokie Deal, Gambling Harm, Bail Laws, Auckland Brothel, Child Support, Alcohol Law Reform, Outrageous Fortune, Anti-smacking, HPV Vaccine, RU486, Child Abuse, Child Poverty, Smacking Law, Gender, Screen Time, Euthanasia, R18 Sex Ed, Day Care, Youth & Alcohol, Value of Family, Why Marriage Matters, Family Issue Polls, Anti-smacking Polls, Family Meals, Smacking Cases, | |||
|
See more about this organisation on these social media sites
|
|||
  |
|||
|
Frustrated on this issue and want to have your say-click below!
|
|||
 |
|||
About this organisationFamily First is NOT a political party and has no intention to be one.
Their role is to be a voice for families in the public domain, and to research and advocate for family and marriage issues.Family First has released its ‘Principles on Family’ – 11 principles highlighting the meaning and significance of the term ‘family’. While there are many forms of family in today’s society, these principles hold true as to what we need to encourage and protect.It has been adapted from “The Natural Family: A Manifesto” developed by the World Congress of Families. The World Congress of Families has been held since 1997 in Prague, Geneva and Mexico City, and was held in Poland (May 07). Note: The below image is a recent screen grab and may not be up to date. Click on the image to see the latest info. |
|||
CLICK ON THE IMAGE ABOVE TO FIND OUT MORE ABOUT FAMILY FIRST |
|||
